Great question, Pat.
To me, the biggest step forward the program could take would be to renovate the basketball facilities. I love the Pizz, but if I didn’t have a sentimental connection to the place, I wouldn’t have many positive things to say about it. I imagine we’ll be hearing about it from other fanbases this coming weekend and I can’t blame them. The new video board is nice, but it’s just putting make-up on the proverbial pig. President Paxson hasn’t been afraid of putting money into athletics - case and point being the $70 million indoor turf facility currently under construction behind the OMAC. I don’t know what kind of renovations would be possible, but they are needed.
I think that the staff does a good job of evaluating and developing talent. The quality of recruit coming into the program has improved significantly in the time that I’ve been following the team. It will be interesting to see if Mike can continue to pick up transfers - guys like Wojcik and Hunsaker were key parts of some of his better teams and helped him overcome weaker recruiting classes. A big ‘what if’ for me is what this team might have looked like if they had managed to hold on to Jacob Dar, the D2 transfer was committed to Brown, before changing his mind and heading to Rice, where he ended up having a nice season, albeit for a team that finished 4-14 in conference play.
The only other thing that comes to mind is whether Mike would consider a Brian Earl/Dave McLaughlin-esque “Come to Jesus” moment in regards to his tactics. I don’t think that Dartmouth’s roster, on paper, is more talented than ours. However, the changes they made clearly instilled confidence in the group and had them playing inspired defense - they went from the worst defense in the league in 2024 to the best this year.
Next year will be an interesting one. It’s hard to know exactly what the league will look like, given the transfer portal and the new coaches coming in, but as of today, I wouldn’t have us in the top 4.
I do think we could be a good defensive team next year, but if you throw out a line-up of Jenkins, Wrisby-Jefferson, Lesburt, Lewis and Dabo, I don’t think you’ll score a lot or efficiently.
Where does your shooting come from next year? Lesburt is great when he’s on, but he’s streaky - he was 10/18 from deep against Columbia and Cornell, but 2/13 in the final three games. They have a sharpshooter from New Jersey, Brady Loughlin, who is coming in next year, but I don’t like to bet on an immediate carry-over of high school shooting performance.
I am hoping for a Jaylan Gainey-esque evolution for Dabo, given the promise he showed as a shot blocker this year. Like Gainey, I don’t think his offensive game will ever be anything more than dunks off of lobs and easy second-chance buckets, but I’d love to be wrong about that.
I don’t think you’re suggesting this, Pat, but your post does lead us to another question: Is it time to think about moving on from Mike Martin?
12 years, 70 Ivy League wins, 2 finishes in the top 4, it’s not exactly the stuff that dreams are made of. He represents the program well, seems to be well-liked by his players, and has stuck around longer than most of his predecessors. Then again, he hasn’t had a season that was even close to the best seasons that Robinson and Miller had. I would love for him to be the guy to take us to the promised land, but he is the longest-tenured coach in the league without a tournament appearance.
I think the league is only going to grow more competitive. Penn and Harvard under-performing opened the door for the Bears, but I don’t think you’re going to be able to count on that for much longer. Columbia hasn’t had any trouble recruiting of late, so with a more competent coach, I expect they won’t be at the bottom of the league for long.
Anyway, this is all to say, I think Grace Calhoun will have some decisions to make in the coming years and those will speak to what the hopes and expectations are for this program.